Judging Workflow

Managing judging workflows through email is inefficient and error-prone. Judges lose track of nominations, feedback gets buried in email threads, and it's nearly impossible to get a clear view of progress across your entire judging panel.

Awardist's judging dashboard provides a centralised workspace where judges can review nominations, leave notes, and submit scorecards.

Reduce access requests and filter out personal information from the nominees that shouldn't impact the judging process. Awardist only shows information the judges need to make informed decisions and reduce bias. Keep things like personal emails or phone numbers from external parties.

Awardist as your trusted data partner is based in the UK and adheres to GDPR and other relevant data protection regulations.

Multiple judges can work simultaneously without stepping on each other's toes. Each judge sees real-time updates from their colleagues, so everyone stays informed about evolving opinions and discussions.

Keep track of your judging progress with intelligent filtering options. See which nominations are still pending review, which ones have received scores from all judges, and which ones need additional discussion.

Filter by category, score range, or custom tags to focus on specific groups of nominations. This is especially valuable for large programs with hundreds of nominees across multiple categories.

Our standardised scoring system ensures consistency across all judges. Rather than relying on subjective interpretations, judges evaluate nominees against clearly defined criteria that you establish.

With all scores and feedback centralised, administrators can quickly identify top candidates and make final decisions with confidence. Export detailed reports with a single click to share results with stakeholders or prepare award announcements.